T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia: treatment experience with fludarabine

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the results of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia treatment with fludarabine by assessing the complete hematologic response, the complete molecular response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. METHODS: We evaluated the records of six patients with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia who were treated with fludarabine as a first-, second-, or third-line therapy, at a dose of 40 mg/m², for three to five days per month and 6 to 8 cycles. RESULTS: Of the six patients investigated with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia who were treated with fludarabine, five (83.3%) were female, and their median age was 36.5 years (range 18 to 73). The median lymphocyte level was 3.4x10(9)/L (0.5 to 8.9). All patients exhibited a monoclonal T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangement at diagnosis. Two (33.3%) patients received fludarabine as first-line treatment, two (33.3%) for refractory disease, one (16.6%) for relapsed disease after the suspension of methotrexate treatment dueto liver toxicity, and one (16.6%) due to dyspesia. A complete hematologic response was achieved in all cases, and a complete molecular response was achieved in five out six cases (83.3%). During a mean follow-up period of 12 months, both the progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 100%. CONCLUSION: T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia demonstrated a high rate of complete hematologic and molecular response to fludarabine, with excellent compliance and tolerability rates. To confirm our results in this rare disease, we believe that fludarabine should be tested in clinical trials as a first-line treatment for T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia.

Disease progression after R-CHOP treatment associated with the loss of CD20 antigen expression

A case of a follicular lymphoma transformed into a CD20+ is described which progressed with the loss of CD20 expression after 8 cycles of R-CHOP. This phenomenon is not a rare event and has shown poor prognosis. Our purposes are to describe this event and suggest biopsy in relapsed or progressive disease.

Bcl-2 protein frequency in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma / Frequência da proteína Bcl-2 em pacientes com linfoma difuso de grandes células B de alto risco

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Gene expression and immunohistochemical profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have revealed important prognostic subgroups: germinal center B-cell-like (GCB-like) DLBCL and activated B cell-like (ABC-like) DLBCL. Although few reports on high-risk DLBCL are available, the prognosis for the GCB-like subgroup has been shown to be better than that of the ABC-like subgroup. The role of Bcl-2 as a predictor of survival in DLBCL cases is unclear and its expression varies between the two subgroups of DLBCL. In this study, we analyzed the frequency and prognostic impact of Bcl-2 protein expression in high-risk DLBCL cases. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study among DLBCL patients treated at Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP). METHODS: The prognostic impact of the expression of the proteins CD10, Bcl-6, MUM1 (multiple myeloma oncogene-1) and Bcl-2 on high-risk DLBCL cases was evaluated by means of immunohistochemistry. Seventy-three patients aged 18-60 years were evaluated for all these markers. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases (32.9 percent) were GCB-like and 49 (67.1 percent) were ABC-like, with no difference regarding complete remission, disease-free survival or overall survival rates. Twenty-seven patients (37 percent) showed Bcl-2 expression, which was the only independent factor predicting a worse prognosis for overall survival according to multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Bcl-2 protein was expressed in 37 percent of the high-risk DLBCL patients, without any difference between the ABC-like DLBCL and GCB-like DLBCL cases.

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A expressão gênica e imunoistoquímica do linfoma difuso de grandes células B (LDGCB) vem permitindo a identificação de importantes subgrupos prognósticos: LDGCB do centro germinativo (CG) e LDGCB de células B ativadas (CBA). Entretanto, existem poucos dados disponíveis com LDGCB de alto risco, sendo o prognóstico dos LDGCB do CG melhor que os LDGCB de CBA. A participação do Bcl-2 como preditor de sobrevida nos LDGCB não é clara e sua expressão é variável entre os dois subgrupos de LDGCB. Neste estudo é avaliada a frequência e o prognóstico da expressão da proteína Bcl-2 em LDGCB de alto risco. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo realizado entre portadores de LDGCB tratados no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. MÉTODOS: Foi avaliado o impacto prognóstico da expressão das proteínas CD10, Bcl-6, MUM1 (multiple myeloma oncogene-1) e Bcl-2 por imunoistoquímica em LDGCB de alto risco. Foram avaliados, para todos os marcadores, 73 pacientes com idade de 18 a 60 anos. RESULTADOS: Vinte e quatro (32,9 por cento) pacientes foram classificados como LDGCB do CG e 49 (67,1 por cento) como LDGCB de CBA, sem diferença nas taxas de remissão completa, sobrevida livre de doença e sobrevida global. Vinte e sete (37 por cento) apresentaram expressão de Bcl-2, o qual foi o único fator preditivo independente de pior prognóstico de sobrevida global à análise multivariada. CONCLUSÃO: A expressão da proteína Bcl-2 ocorreu em 37 por cento dos portadores de LDGCB de alto risco, sem diferença entre os subgrupos de LDGCB do CG ou de CBA.

Triagem para o tratamento ambulatorial da neutropenia febril / Screening for the outpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia

A neutropenia febril (NF) é uma complicação frequente e potencialmente fatal nos pacientes em tratamento quimioterápico. Entendemos hoje que a neutropenia febril é considerada uma emergência clínica e que a administração de antibióticos de amplo espectro diminui drasticamente a mortalidade. Estudos sugerem que a neutropenia febril compreende um grupo extremamente heterogêneo e que dados clínicos como febre domiciliar, ausência de hipotensão, ausência de desidratação, ausência de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica, ausência de outros sintomas, ausência de infecção fúngica prévia e idade < 60 anos são fatores de proteção para complicações clínicas graves segundo o estudo da Multinational Association for Supportive Care of Cancer (MASCC). Estes dados permitem maior segurança para o tratamento ambulatorial e alta precoce, uma vez que estudos fármaco-econômicos demonstram importante redução de custos no tratamento ambulatorial da neutropenia febril. O objetivo desta revisão é discutir instrumentos de segurança da triagem de um paciente neutropênico febril (principalmente pela utilização do índice MASCC), como também demonstrar as formas descritas na literatura do tratamento ambulatorial e seus resultados.

Febrile neutropenia is a frequent and potentially fatal adverse event of chemotherapy. Nowadays, febrile neutropenia is considered an emergency and it is known that prompt infusion of antibiotics decreases mortality. Several studies demonstrated that febrile neutropenia is a heterogeneous group of diseases and that factors such as outpatient status, no hypotension, no dehydration, no chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, no symptoms, no previous fungal infection and age < 60 years are protective factors against serious complications as demonstrated by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). These data show that outpatient treatment and early discharge is safer and much research has shown lower costs for outpatient treatment in low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia. The aim of this work is to review and discuss tools (in particular the MASCC index) for safe screening of febrile neutropenia for outpatient treatment in addition to demonstrate results of research.

Risk stratification for indolent lymphomas / Estratificação de risco dos linfomas indolentes

Indolent B-cell lymphomas account for approximately 40 percent of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). Advances in technology have contributed to improvements in the diagnosis and classification of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Follicular Lymphomas are the most common although the frequency varies significantly throughout the world. The description of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) was an important step in identifying patient subgroups, but its use in the clinical practice has not been established yet. The use of a larger number of paraffin active monoclonal antibodies for immunohistochemistry, molecular cytogenetic studies including standard cytogenetics, multi-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction and locus-specific fluorescence insitu hybridization as well as developments in high-resolution techniquesincluding microarray gene expression profiling allow more accurate diagnosis andprecise definition of biomarkers of value in risk stratification. The identification ofdiseasespecific gene lists resulting from expression profiling provides a number ofpotential protein targets that can be validated using immunohistochemistry. Analysesof gene expression profiles or constitutive gene variations may also provide additional insight for prognostication in the near future. A comprehensive understanding of the biology of these distinct lymphoid tumors will allow us to identify novel diseaserelated genes and should facilitate the development of improved diagnosis, outcome prediction, and personalized approaches to treatment.

Os linfomas de células B indolentes representam aproximadamente 40 por cento do total de linfomas não Hodgkin (LNHs). O avanço das tecnologias novas tem contribuído para a melhora no diagnóstico e classificação dos LNH indolentes. O linfoma folicular é o mais comum e sua frequência varia significantemente pelo mundo. Adescrição do Índice Internacional de Prognóstico dos linfomas folicular (FLIPI) representa um passo importante na identificação de subgrupos de pacientes, mas seu uso na prática clínica ainda necessita ser estabelecido. O uso de um número maior de anticorpos monoclonais para imunoistoquímica, estudo citogenético incluindo citogenética convencional ou hibridização in-situ por fluorescência (FISH), bem como o desenvolvimento de técnicas de alta resolução incluindo a expressão por microarray possibilita maior acurácia no diagnóstico e definição precisa dos biomarcadores com valor na estratificação de risco. A identificação de genes específicos para os diversos tipos de linfomas permite o reconhecimento de potenciais proteínas alvo que podem ser validadas usando imunoistoquímica. Análises da expressão do perfil de genes ou variações genéticas constitutivas pode também prover conhecimentos adicionais para o prognóstico em um futuro próximo. Um entendimento da biologia desses distintos tumores linfoides permite-nos identificar novos grupos de genes relacionados à doença e deve facilitar o desenvolvimento diagnóstico, predizendo a evolução e permitindo tratamentos personalizados.